Design Resources Server |
|
||||
IASRI | |||||
Home |
<<Back Analysis Using SPSS Main Procedure is: Start →All Programs → SPSS for Windows → SPSS 15.0/ SPSS13.0/ SPSS10.0 (based on the version available on your machine) → Enter data in Data Editor → Analyze → GLM → Univariate → syield → [puts syield under Dependent list: ] → blk → [put blk under Fixed Factor(s): ] trt → [put trt under Fixed Factor(s):] Continue → Model... [Opens Model dialogue box] → Custom → Build Term(s) → Main effects → [puts rep blk, trt under Model: ] → Paste → It comes in Syntax mode, then define model as rep blk(rep) trt → Run all. For performing analysis, input the data in the following format. Here the strain codes are termed as treatments trt, Replication as rep, block as blk and seed yield as syield. (It may, however, be noted that one can retain the same name or can code in any other fashion). Following are the brief description of the steps along with screen shots. · Open Data editor: Start → All Programs → SPSS for Windows → SPSS 15.0/ SPSS13.0/ SPSS10.0. · Enter data in SPSS Data Editor. There are two views in SPSS Data Editor. In variable view, one can define the name of variables and variable types string or numeric and data view gives the spreadsheet in which data pertaining to variables may be entered in respective columns. In the present case, we enter data in numeric format
·
Once
the data entry is complete, Choose Analyze from the Menu
Bar. Now select
· This selection displays the following screen
· Select
syield and send it to the Dependent Variable box; blk and
trt may be selected for Fixed
· Click
Continue
to return back to the Univariate dialog box, then click paste
to
get the commands in
For identification of the treatments that gave significantly
higher yield than the best performing check, one /Lmatrix '20 vs 23' trt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 0; /Lmatrix '21 vs 23' trt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0;
· Click Run → All.
The following syntax may be used after
creating the data file to get the output. UNIANOVA syield BY rep blk trt /METHOD = SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT = INCLUDE /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) /Lmatrix '20 vs 21' trt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0; /Lmatrix '20 vs 23' trt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 0; /Lmatrix '21 vs 23' trt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0; /DESIGN =rep blk(rep) trt .
One can easily see that treatment 21 is the best performing check. Now make 21 elementary contrasts for comparing best performing check (21) with each of the new strains (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 24). This will be helpful for identifying the strains that perform significantly better than the best performing check. The contrasts may be written as above or as in Incomplete block designs. Alternatively, all possible pair wise treatment comparisons can be performed using the Button Options on the dialogue box. A click on Button Options, gives the option for estimated marginal means and display means for. From the left hand box, take the effect treatment in the Display means for. Then check the box Compare main effects and then there are 3 options for confidence interval adjustment viz. LSD(none), Bonferrnoni and Sidak. Any one of these 3 options can be selected. Default option is LSD(None). A screen shot for these options is
Alternatively,
the following syntax may be used after
creating the data file to get the output. UNIANOVA syield BY rep blk trt /METHOD = SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT = INCLUDE /EMMEANS = TABLES(trt) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN =rep blk(rep) trt .
Analysis Using SAS
Analysis Using SPSS
Home Descriptive Statistics Tests of Significance Correlation and Regression Completely Randomised Design RCB Design Incomplete Block Design Resolvable Block Design Augmented Design Latin Square Design Factorial RCB Design Partially Confounded Design Factorial Experiment with Extra Treatments Split Plot Design Strip Plot Design Response Surface Design Cross Over Design Analysis of Covariance Diagnostics and Remedial Measures Principal Component Analysis Cluster Analysis Groups of Experiments Non-Linear Models
Copyright Disclaimer How to Quote this page Report Error Comments/suggestions |
||||
Descriptive Statistics | |||||
Tests of Significance | |||||
Correlation and Regression | |||||
Completely Randomised Design | |||||
RCB Design | |||||
Incomplete Block Design | |||||
Resolvable Block Design | |||||
Augmented Design | |||||
Latin Square Design | |||||
Factorial RCB Design | |||||
Partially Confounded Design | |||||
Factorial Experiment with Extra Treatments | |||||
Split Plot Design | |||||
Strip Plot Design | |||||
Response Surface Design | |||||
Cross Over Design | |||||
Analysis of Covariance | |||||
Diagnostics and Remedial Measures | |||||
Principal Component Analysis | |||||
Cluster Analysis | |||||
Groups of Experiments | |||||
Non-Linear Models | |||||
Contact Us | |||||
Other
Designed Experiments (Under Development) |
|||||
For
exposure on SAS, SPSS, Please see Module I of Electronic Book II: Advances in Data Analytical Techniques available at Design Resource Server (www.iasri.res.in/design) |
|||||